The Jewish religion calls it l'dor v'dor or from generation to generation, but it doesn't seem that simple when it comes to handing down a charitable family foundation from one generation to the next. The first generation has tremendous financial success or sacrifices to accumulate wealth. They many times raise the standard of living for their family to significant heights. They may also have certain philanthropic goals they would like to have met, specific areas they would like to have a portion of their wealth go to. They may just have a need to not be forgotten, to leave a personal legacy. Many times however, second and third generations forget the sacrifices the donor generation has made, the charitable goals they had or the legacy they intended for themselves. Those people closest to them change the game plan.
In a New York Times article (Sept. 29, 2007) entitled "Donors Gone, Trusts Veer From Their Wishes", Stephanie Strom points out how banks and most specifically large bank trust departments, abuse "orphan trusts", or those trusts or foundations with no living member to assure that the donors wishes are met. She outlines how many trust departments , which are very transient areas for large banks, manipulate these charitable vessels for their own goals, completely ignoring the wishes of the originator. In fact, many times the bank employee that has given the donor their comfort level and has the understanding of what the donor would like to accomplish, moves on and is quickly replaced by another employee with no knowledge of the situation. These asset managers also play with the principal, investing in inappropriate vehicles or finessing the cashflows for the banks best interest.
For a stranger to capitalize on a deceased donor is inappropriate and sleazy, for a family member to do so is unconscionable. Many times the donors own children wipe them from the title, eliminating their legacy. The Robert and Roberta Smith Family Foundation may become simply The Smith Family Foundation. Sons can replace the parents names for theirs, changing the previous example with The John and Joan Smith Family Foundation, and a daughter may actually take the family name off the title, eliminating the family legacy with The John and Joan Jones Family Foundation after her new married name.
Taking advantage of the deceased is nothing new, but to take advantage of those that simply want to help others, we need a higher conscience. Family members should be sensitive to say, "This isn't my legacy, it's my relative's." If it's impossible to work within the donors wish list, let the new breed of sensitive, nurturing professionals do it, for everyone's sake...the donor, the grantee, the needy.